Bodiford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bodiford v. State

216 S.W.2d 223, 152 Tex. Crim. 549, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 943

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 5, 1949

DocketNo. 24207.

StatusPublished

This text of 216 S.W.2d 223 (Bodiford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bodiford v. State, 216 S.W.2d 223, 152 Tex. Crim. 549, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 943 (Tex. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for burglary with a sentence of two years in the penitentiary.

The trial was to a jury and the evidence was sufficient to support their verdict. The record contains no bills of exception and no exceptions were taken to the court’s charge. No brief was filed in the case and we are not informed of any contention made which would support a reversal.

Finding no error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for burglary with a sentence of two years in the penitentiary.

The trial was to a jury and the evidence was sufficient to support their verdict. The record contains no bills of exception and no exceptions were taken to the court’s charge. No brief was filed in the case and we are not informed of any contention made which would support a reversal.

Finding no error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 S.W.2d 223, 152 Tex. Crim. 549, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodiford-v-state-texcrimapp-1949.