Bodie v. . Horn

190 S.E. 236, 211 N.C. 397, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 17, 1937
StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.E. 236 (Bodie v. . Horn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bodie v. . Horn, 190 S.E. 236, 211 N.C. 397, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 105 (N.C. 1937).

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

The basis of the judgment is that the transactions alleged in the complaint are denominated “futures,” no actual delivery of the articles sold being intended or contemplated, and therefore declared illegal by C. S., 2144. Orvis Bros. & Co. v. Holt-Morgan Mills, 173 N. C., 231, 91 S. E., 948. It is also observed that the complaint contains no allegation of a promise to pay on the part of the defendant, which, perhaps, the plaintiff assumed the law would imply. However, in all events, the judgment sustaining the demurrer would seem to be correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orvis Bros. v. Holt-Morgan Mills
91 S.E. 948 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.E. 236, 211 N.C. 397, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodie-v-horn-nc-1937.