Bodie v. . Horn

190 S.E. 236, 211 N.C. 397, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 105
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 17, 1937·Published

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

The basis of the judgment is that the transactions alleged in the complaint are denominated “futures,” no actual delivery of the articles sold being intended or contemplated, and therefore declared illegal by C. S., 2144. Orvis Bros. & Co. v. Holt-Morgan Mills, 173 N. C., 231, 91 S. E., 948. It is also observed that the complaint contains no allegation of a promise to pay on the part of the defendant, which, perhaps, the plaintiff assumed the law would imply. However, in all events, the judgment sustaining the demurrer would seem to be correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bodie v. . Horn, 190 S.E. 236, 211 N.C. 397, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 105 (N.C. 1937).

190 S.E. 236 (Bodie v. . Horn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orvis Bros. v. Holt-Morgan Mills
91 S.E. 948 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)