Bodge v. Bodge

Washington Supreme Court

Bodge v. Bodge

438 P.3d 127, 193 Wash. 2d 1003

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedApril 3, 2019

DocketNo. 96682-6

StatusPublished

This text of 438 P.3d 127 (Bodge v. Bodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bodge v. Bodge, 438 P.3d 127, 193 Wash. 2d 1003 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a petition for review is denied and therefore the petition for review is dismissed as untimely. The Respondent's requests for attorney fees and for sanctions are also denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a petition for review is denied and therefore the petition for review is dismissed as untimely. The Respondent's requests for attorney fees and for sanctions are also denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

438 P.3d 127, 193 Wash. 2d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodge-v-bodge-wash-2019.