Bodet v. Nibourel
This text of 25 La. Ann. 499 (Bodet v. Nibourel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ action in this case is founded upon attachment. They claim that the defendant owes them $1706, with interest, and, under their writ of attachment, caused to be seized a stock of merchandise.
The defendant moved to set aside the attachment on the folio wing-grounds:
First — That the attachment bond is insufficient in amount, and not such as the law requires.
Second — That the affidavit‘is insufficient, and does not meet the requirements of law.
The motion to dismiss was sustained and the suit dismissed.
We think there is error in the judgment. The amount of the bond, it seems, is less than one-half over and above the amount of the debt, alleged to be owing, by less than one dollar. De minimis non curat lex.
The affidavit we think sufficiently explicit, and that it authorized the issuing of the attachment.
It is therefore ordered, that the judgment of the district court be annulled and reversed. It is further ordered, that the case be remanded to the court a qua, for further proceedings.according to law, the defendant and'appellee paying costs of this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 La. Ann. 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodet-v-nibourel-la-1873.