Bodenschatz v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bodenschatz v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

685 S.W.2d 596

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 1985

DocketNo. 48573

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 685 S.W.2d 596 (Bodenschatz v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bodenschatz v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 685 S.W.2d 596 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Dean Bodenschatz appeals from a decision of the St. Louis County Circuit Court, affirming the final judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which held that appellant had not developed an occupational disease, and was thus ineligible for Worker’s Compensation benefits. The evidence in support of the Commission’s judgment being sufficient and no error of law appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Dean Bodenschatz appeals from a decision of the St. Louis County Circuit Court, affirming the final judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which held that appellant had not developed an occupational disease, and was thus ineligible for Worker’s Compensation benefits. The evidence in support of the Commission’s judgment being sufficient and no error of law appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 S.W.2d 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodenschatz-v-mcdonnell-douglas-corp-moctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack