Bodenheim v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bodenheim v. City of New York

163 A.D. 841, 146 N.Y.S. 1084

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 841 (Bodenheim v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bodenheim v. City of New York, 163 A.D. 841, 146 N.Y.S. 1084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There was no evidence that the defendant was negligent. The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court are, therefore, reversed and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs in all courts. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Determination of Appellate Term and judgment of Municipal Court reversed and judgment directed for defendant, with costs in all courts. Order to he settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

There was no evidence that the defendant was negligent. The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court are, therefore, reversed and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs in all courts. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Determination of Appellate Term and judgment of Municipal Court reversed and judgment directed for defendant, with costs in all courts. Order to he settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 841, 146 N.Y.S. 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodenheim-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1914.