Bodenheim v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bodenheim v. City of New York

163 A.D. 841, 146 N.Y.S. 1084

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1914·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There was no evidence that the defendant was negligent. The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court are, therefore, reversed and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs in all courts. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Determination of Appellate Term and judgment of Municipal Court reversed and judgment directed for defendant, with costs in all courts. Order to he settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

There was no evidence that the defendant was negligent. The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the Municipal Court are, therefore, reversed and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs in all courts. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Determination of Appellate Term and judgment of Municipal Court reversed and judgment directed for defendant, with costs in all courts. Order to he settled on notice.

Bodenheim v. City of New York, 163 A.D. 841, 146 N.Y.S. 1084 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

163 A.D. 841 (Bodenheim v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.