Boddie v. State

521 So. 2d 338, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 666, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 876, 1988 WL 18692
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1472
StatusPublished

This text of 521 So. 2d 338 (Boddie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boddie v. State, 521 So. 2d 338, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 666, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 876, 1988 WL 18692 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record contains sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to suppress. See Medina v. State, 466 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1985); McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNamara v. State
357 So. 2d 410 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Medina v. State
466 So. 2d 1046 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 So. 2d 338, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 666, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 876, 1988 WL 18692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boddie-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.