BODDICE v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

BODDICE v. State

53 So. 3d 381, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 589, 2011 WL 249362

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2011·No. 5D10-3480·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Boddice appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm as to each of the issues raised by Boddice, save one. In his motion, Bod-dice alleged that he did not receive sufficient jail credit for time served after his violation of probation arrest. The trial court failed to address this issue. On remand, it is directed to do so.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Boddice appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm as to each of the issues raised by Boddice, save one. In his motion, Bod-dice alleged that he did not receive sufficient jail credit for time served after his violation of probation arrest. The trial court failed to address this issue. On remand, it is directed to do so.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

BODDICE v. State, 53 So. 3d 381, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 589, 2011 WL 249362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

53 So. 3d 381 (BODDICE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.