BODDICE v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

BODDICE v. State

53 So. 3d 381, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 589, 2011 WL 249362

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 28, 2011

Docket5D10-3480

StatusPublished

This text of 53 So. 3d 381 (BODDICE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BODDICE v. State, 53 So. 3d 381, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 589, 2011 WL 249362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Boddice appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm as to each of the issues raised by Boddice, save one. In his motion, Bod-dice alleged that he did not receive sufficient jail credit for time served after his violation of probation arrest. The trial court failed to address this issue. On remand, it is directed to do so.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Boddice appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm as to each of the issues raised by Boddice, save one. In his motion, Bod-dice alleged that he did not receive sufficient jail credit for time served after his violation of probation arrest. The trial court failed to address this issue. On remand, it is directed to do so.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 So. 3d 381, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 589, 2011 WL 249362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boddice-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.