Bodack v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

489 A.2d 1363, 507 Pa. 342
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 9, 1985·No. Appeal No. 25 Western District Appeal Docket 1983·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 1985, the Order of the Commonwealth Court filed January 28, 1983, 71 Pa.Cmwlth. 454, 455 A.2d 734, dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of prohibition is affirmed, Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. Laird, 360 Pa. 94, 61 A.2d 426 (1948). See also Barasch, Consumer Advocate v. PUC and Pennsylvania Power Company, 507 Pa. 496, 491 A.2d 94 (1984).

LARSEN, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent and would reach the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bodack v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 489 A.2d 1363, 507 Pa. 342 (Pa. 1985).

489 A.2d 1363 (Bodack v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
491 A.2d 94 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. Laird
61 A.2d 426 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Bodack v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
455 A.2d 734 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)