Bodack v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bodack v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

489 A.2d 1363, 507 Pa. 342

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 9, 1985

DocketAppeal No. 25 Western District Appeal Docket 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 489 A.2d 1363 (Bodack v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bodack v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 489 A.2d 1363, 507 Pa. 342 (Pa. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 1985, the Order of the Commonwealth Court filed January 28, 1983, 71 Pa.Cmwlth. 454, 455 A.2d 734, dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of prohibition is affirmed, Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. Laird, 360 Pa. 94, 61 A.2d 426 (1948). See also Barasch, Consumer Advocate v. PUC and Pennsylvania Power Company, 507 Pa. 496, 491 A.2d 94 (1984).

LARSEN, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent and would reach the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 1985, the Order of the Commonwealth Court filed January 28, 1983, 71 Pa.Cmwlth. 454, 455 A.2d 734, dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of prohibition is affirmed, Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. Laird, 360 Pa. 94, 61 A.2d 426 (1948). See also Barasch, Consumer Advocate v. PUC and Pennsylvania Power Company, 507 Pa. 496, 491 A.2d 94 (1984).

LARSEN, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent and would reach the merits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 A.2d 1363, 507 Pa. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodack-v-pennsylvania-public-utility-commission-pa-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack