Bocz v. Fry

Sixth Circuit

Bocz v. Fry

118 F.2d 1013, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1941

DocketNo. 8482

StatusPublished

This text of 118 F.2d 1013 (Bocz v. Fry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bocz v. Fry, 118 F.2d 1013, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, appellant appearing in his own behalf, and it appearing to the court that due to the chaotic and insufficient condition of the record and to the confused, indefinite, and incoherent contents of appellant’s brief, no basis for assignments or averments of error is disclosed.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decree appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, appellant appearing in his own behalf, and it appearing to the court that due to the chaotic and insufficient condition of the record and to the confused, indefinite, and incoherent contents of appellant’s brief, no basis for assignments or averments of error is disclosed.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decree appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 F.2d 1013, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bocz-v-fry-ca6-1941.