Bocz v. Fry

Sixth Circuit

Bocz v. Fry

118 F.2d 1013, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 10, 1941·No. No. 8482·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, appellant appearing in his own behalf, and it appearing to the court that due to the chaotic and insufficient condition of the record and to the confused, indefinite, and incoherent contents of appellant’s brief, no basis for assignments or averments of error is disclosed.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decree appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, appellant appearing in his own behalf, and it appearing to the court that due to the chaotic and insufficient condition of the record and to the confused, indefinite, and incoherent contents of appellant’s brief, no basis for assignments or averments of error is disclosed.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decree appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Bocz v. Fry, 118 F.2d 1013, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4161 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

118 F.2d 1013 (Bocz v. Fry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.