Bockian v. United Candy Co.

102 A. 393, 91 N.J.L. 314, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 252
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 11, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 102 A. 393 (Bockian v. United Candy Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bockian v. United Candy Co., 102 A. 393, 91 N.J.L. 314, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 252 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons sot forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Hepenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A. 393, 91 N.J.L. 314, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bockian-v-united-candy-co-nj-1917.