Bockhaus v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

167 A.D. 927
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 A.D. 927 (Bockhaus v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bockhaus v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 167 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. (Ingraham, P. J., dissénted on the ground • that the application of the maxim res ipsa loquitur and the evidence of an uncommon jerk, which was the immediate cause of the accident, presented a question for the jury as to the negligence of the defendant.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sykes v. City of New York
269 A.D. 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D. 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bockhaus-v-interborough-rapid-transit-co-nyappdiv-1915.