Bockey v. Rasmussen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bockey v. Rasmussen

564 S.W.3d 421

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106380

StatusPublished

This text of 564 S.W.3d 421 (Bockey v. Rasmussen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bockey v. Rasmussen, 564 S.W.3d 421 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timothy W. Rasmussen appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, denying his motion to modify his child support obligation to Deborah A. Bockey, f/k/a Deborah A. Rasmussen. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the circuit court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Timothy W. Rasmussen appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, denying his motion to modify his child support obligation to Deborah A. Bockey, f/k/a Deborah A. Rasmussen. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the circuit court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 S.W.3d 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bockey-v-rasmussen-moctapp-2018.