Bockel v. Rudman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Bockel v. Rudman

26 La. Ann. 208

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 15, 1874·No. No. 5012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Wtlt, J.

In this case the judge fixed no amount for an appeal [209]*209bond. A suspensive appeal was granted on appellants giving bond conditioned according to law.

The amount of the appeal bond is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal. It will not do for a devolutive appeal, because it is not for an amount fixed by the judge. The motion to dismiss on this ground must therefore prevail.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wtlt, J.

In this case the judge fixed no amount for an appeal [209]*209bond. A suspensive appeal was granted on appellants giving bond conditioned according to law.

The amount of the appeal bond is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal. It will not do for a devolutive appeal, because it is not for an amount fixed by the judge. The motion to dismiss on this ground must therefore prevail.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Rehearing refused.

Bockel v. Rudman, 26 La. Ann. 208 (La. 1874).

Pincite

26 La. Ann. 208 (Bockel v. Rudman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related