Bockel v. Rudman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Bockel v. Rudman

26 La. Ann. 208

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 15, 1874

DocketNo. 5012

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 26 La. Ann. 208 (Bockel v. Rudman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bockel v. Rudman, 26 La. Ann. 208 (La. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Wtlt, J.

In this case the judge fixed no amount for an appeal [209]*209bond. A suspensive appeal was granted on appellants giving bond conditioned according to law.

The amount of the appeal bond is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal. It will not do for a devolutive appeal, because it is not for an amount fixed by the judge. The motion to dismiss on this ground must therefore prevail.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wtlt, J.

In this case the judge fixed no amount for an appeal [209]*209bond. A suspensive appeal was granted on appellants giving bond conditioned according to law.

The amount of the appeal bond is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal. It will not do for a devolutive appeal, because it is not for an amount fixed by the judge. The motion to dismiss on this ground must therefore prevail.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Rehearing refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 La. Ann. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bockel-v-rudman-la-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack