Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bockar v. Sakolsky

Bockar v. Sakolsky

592 So. 2d 251, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6829, 1991 WL 128322
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 1991
DocketNo. 90-2683
StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 251 (Bockar v. Sakolsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bockar v. Sakolsky, 592 So. 2d 251, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6829, 1991 WL 128322 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Arnold Bockar appeals from a final summary judgment in an action for breach of contract and for fraud. We affirm.

Only salaried real estate salespersons who do not receive commissions for the sale or lease of real property may sue for compensation earned without being a licensed real estate salesperson or broker. See Department of Bus. Reg. v. Smith, 471 So.2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); § 475.-011(2), Fla.Stat. (1987).

Affirmed.

JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Real Estate Commission v. McGregor
336 So. 2d 1156 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
DEPT. OF BUSINESS REG. v. Smith
471 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 So. 2d 251, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6829, 1991 WL 128322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bockar-v-sakolsky-fladistctapp-1991.