Bock v. BROADWAY FORD TRUCK SALES, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bock v. BROADWAY FORD TRUCK SALES, INC.

293 S.W.3d 451, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 730, 2008 WL 2168963

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 27, 2008·No. ED 90517·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Broadway Ford Truck Sales, Inc. (“Employer”) and the Reliance Insurance Company (“Reliance”) c/o the Illinois Insurance Guaranty Association (“Guarantor”) appeal from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) that modified the award from the administrative law judge (“ALJ”), and awarded the estate of Charles Bock (“Employee”) past medical expenses of $112,871.25 and temporary total disability (“TTD”) benefits of $53,236.64 for the period from July 16, 1998 through July 25, 2000, in addition to $33,147.95 in TTD benefits for May 5, 1998 through July 25, 1998.

Wb have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Broadway Ford Truck Sales, Inc. (“Employer”) and the Reliance Insurance Company (“Reliance”) c/o the Illinois Insurance Guaranty Association (“Guarantor”) appeal from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) that modified the award from the administrative law judge (“ALJ”), and awarded the estate of Charles Bock (“Employee”) past medical expenses of $112,871.25 and temporary total disability (“TTD”) benefits of $53,236.64 for the period from July 16, 1998 through July 25, 2000, in addition to $33,147.95 in TTD benefits for May 5, 1998 through July 25, 1998.

Wb have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Bock v. BROADWAY FORD TRUCK SALES, INC., 293 S.W.3d 451, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 730, 2008 WL 2168963 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

293 S.W.3d 451 (Bock v. BROADWAY FORD TRUCK SALES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.