Bock v. Bock

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bock v. Bock

302 So. 2d 774

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1974·No. No. 74-32·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, including the financial affidavits. Our review did not uncover the changed circumstances contemplated by Section 61.14, Florida Statutes, to warrant a modification. Accordingly, that portion of the order entered by the trial judge which modifies the original judgment of dissolution of marriage must be reversed. Bloemendaal v. Bloemendaal, Fla.App.4th, 1973, 275 So.2d 30. The provisions of the order appealed awarding appellant attorney’s fees and ordering appellee to pay ar-rearages alimony is affirmed.

Reversed in part; affirmed in part.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, including the financial affidavits. Our review did not uncover the changed circumstances contemplated by Section 61.14, Florida Statutes, to warrant a modification. Accordingly, that portion of the order entered by the trial judge which modifies the original judgment of dissolution of marriage must be reversed. Bloemendaal v. Bloemendaal, Fla.App.4th, 1973, 275 So.2d 30. The provisions of the order appealed awarding appellant attorney’s fees and ordering appellee to pay ar-rearages alimony is affirmed.

Reversed in part; affirmed in part.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Bock v. Bock, 302 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

302 So. 2d 774 (Bock v. Bock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related