Bock v. Bock

302 So. 2d 774
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1974
DocketNo. 74-32
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 So. 2d 774 (Bock v. Bock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bock v. Bock, 302 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, including the financial affidavits. Our review did not uncover the changed circumstances contemplated by Section 61.14, Florida Statutes, to warrant a modification. Accordingly, that portion of the order entered by the trial judge which modifies the original judgment of dissolution of marriage must be reversed. Bloemendaal v. Bloemendaal, Fla.App.4th, 1973, 275 So.2d 30. The provisions of the order appealed awarding appellant attorney’s fees and ordering appellee to pay ar-rearages alimony is affirmed.

Reversed in part; affirmed in part.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bock v. Bock
311 So. 2d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 So. 2d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bock-v-bock-fladistctapp-1974.