Bocchino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bocchino v. State

782 So. 2d 484, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3851, 2001 WL 280586

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 23, 2001·No. No. 2D00-4548·Published

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Stephen Bocchino’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) without prejudice to any right that Bocchino might have to file a timely and legally sufficient rule 3.850 motion pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc), challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea.

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SALCINES, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Stephen Bocchino’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) without prejudice to any right that Bocchino might have to file a timely and legally sufficient rule 3.850 motion pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc), challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea.

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., concur.

Bocchino v. State, 782 So. 2d 484, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3851, 2001 WL 280586 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

782 So. 2d 484 (Bocchino v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related