Bocarro v. Pinto

912 So. 2d 57, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14302, 2005 WL 2205483
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 2005·No. No. 1D04-2832·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The narrow issue presented in this case is whether the appellant’s status as a resident of India precluded her from bringing a separate maintenance action against her husband, a Florida resident, for child support pursuant to section 61.09, Florida Statutes. We conclude that, under the facts of this case, it did not. See Howell v. Howell, 545 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Wachsmuth v. Wachsmuth, 528 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Weinschel v. Weinschel, 368 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Martin v. Martin, 128 So.2d 386 (Fla.1961); Tinsley v. Tinsley, 125 So.2d 553 (Fla.1960); Kiplinger v. Kiplinger, 147 Fla. 243, 2 So.2d 870 (1941). The order under review is accordingly reversed.

ERVIN, ALLEN and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bocarro v. Pinto, 912 So. 2d 57, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14302, 2005 WL 2205483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

912 So. 2d 57 (Bocarro v. Pinto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinschel v. Weinschel
368 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Kiplinger v. Kiplinger
2 So. 2d 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Tinsley v. Tinsley
125 So. 2d 553 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
Martin v. Martin
128 So. 2d 386 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Wachsmuth v. Wachsmuth
528 So. 2d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Howell v. Howell
545 So. 2d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)