Bocarro v. Pinto

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bocarro v. Pinto

912 So. 2d 57, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14302, 2005 WL 2205483

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 13, 2005

DocketNo. 1D04-2832

StatusPublished

This text of 912 So. 2d 57 (Bocarro v. Pinto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bocarro v. Pinto, 912 So. 2d 57, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14302, 2005 WL 2205483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The narrow issue presented in this case is whether the appellant’s status as a resident of India precluded her from bringing a separate maintenance action against her husband, a Florida resident, for child support pursuant to section 61.09, Florida Statutes. We conclude that, under the facts of this case, it did not. See Howell v. Howell, 545 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Wachsmuth v. Wachsmuth, 528 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Weinschel v. Weinschel, 368 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Martin v. Martin, 128 So.2d 386 (Fla.1961); Tinsley v. Tinsley, 125 So.2d 553 (Fla.1960); Kiplinger v. Kiplinger, 147 Fla. 243, 2 So.2d 870 (1941). The order under review is accordingly reversed.

ERVIN, ALLEN and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The narrow issue presented in this case is whether the appellant’s status as a resident of India precluded her from bringing a separate maintenance action against her husband, a Florida resident, for child support pursuant to section 61.09, Florida Statutes. We conclude that, under the facts of this case, it did not. See Howell v. Howell, 545 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Wachsmuth v. Wachsmuth, 528 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Weinschel v. Weinschel, 368 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Martin v. Martin, 128 So.2d 386 (Fla.1961); Tinsley v. Tinsley, 125 So.2d 553 (Fla.1960); Kiplinger v. Kiplinger, 147 Fla. 243, 2 So.2d 870 (1941). The order under review is accordingly reversed.

ERVIN, ALLEN and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

912 So. 2d 57, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14302, 2005 WL 2205483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bocarro-v-pinto-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack