Boca Raton Sprinkler v. Andrews

416 So. 2d 846, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20452
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 1982
DocketNo. AF-354
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 416 So. 2d 846 (Boca Raton Sprinkler v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boca Raton Sprinkler v. Andrews, 416 So. 2d 846, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20452 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

JOANOS, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal a compensation order. We affirm.

There was no error in not apportioning the disability. There was competent substantial evidence that the former injury was asymptomatic and not progressing, Evans v. Florida Industrial Commission, 196 So.2d 748 (Fla.1967).

The selection of January 21, 1981, as the date of maximum medical improvement is supported by competent substantial evidence.

The evidence reflects that claimant’s job search was sufficient.

McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Escambia County Council v. Goldsmith
465 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 So. 2d 846, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boca-raton-sprinkler-v-andrews-fladistctapp-1982.