Boca Invst Prtnshp v. United States

314 F.3d 625
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 28, 2003·No. 01-5429·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 01–5429 September Term, 2002

Filed On: March 26, 2003

BOCA INVESTERINGS PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., APPELLEES

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT

–———— Before: SENTELLE, HENDERSON and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER On consideration of appellees’ unopposed motion to modify the opinion in this case, it is ORDERED that the opinion in the above-captioned case filed on January 10, 2003, be, and it hereby is, amended as follows: Page 2, line 30, add the following sentence: ‘‘This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consis- tent with this opinion.’’ Page 12, line 5, last sentence now reads: ‘‘Because the district court did not find that a legitimate, non-tax necessity existed for the formation of the Boca partner- ship, and because the evidence of record would not have supported such a finding if made, we reverse and remand 2

this case to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.’’

For the Court: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

By: Michael C. McGrail Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boca Invst Prtnshp v. United States, 314 F.3d 625 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

314 F.3d 625 (Boca Invst Prtnshp v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.