Bobo v. State
763 S.W.2d 312, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1682, 1988 WL 129577
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bobo v. State, 763 S.W.2d 312, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1682, 1988 WL 129577 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
763 S.W.2d 312 (Bobo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.