Bobo v. Norton

10 Ohio St. (N.S.) 514
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1860·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

In an action brought March 15,1856, upon a. recognizance executed February 3, 1838, for stay of execution on a judgment upon a docket of a justice of the peace of this state, upon demurrer to answer, setting up that the action did not accrue within fifteen years next before it was brought: Held, that such recognizance is a specialty within the meaning of the 13th section of the code of civil procedure, and that therefore an action can not* be brought thereon after the expiration of fifteen years, Stockwell v. Coleman, ante, 33, followed and approved.

John Welch, for plaintiff in error. ¿3. £. Knowles, for defendant in error,

Judgment sustaining the demurrer to the answer reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bobo v. Norton, 10 Ohio St. (N.S.) 514 (Ohio 1860).

10 Ohio St. (N.S.) 514 (Bobo v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.