Bobo v. Caterair International Corp.
This text of 657 So. 2d 4 (Bobo v. Caterair International Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission’s order denying appellant unemployment benefits. We hold that the record does not support a finding of theft by appellant. The evidence demonstrates that appellant’s conduct did not rise to the level of “wilful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests_” § 443.036(26)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); Adams v. Burdines, Inc., 600 So.2d 1233, 1234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Fredericks v. Florida Dept. of Commerce, 323 So.2d 286, 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
657 So. 2d 4, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 1995 WL 144265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobo-v-caterair-international-corp-fladistctapp-1995.