Bobo v. Caterair International Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bobo v. Caterair International Corp.

657 So. 2d 4, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 1995 WL 144265

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 1995·No. No. 94-1206·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission’s order denying appellant unemployment benefits. We hold that the record does not support a finding of theft by appellant. The evidence demonstrates that appellant’s conduct did not rise to the level of “wilful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests_” § 443.036(26)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); Adams v. Burdines, Inc., 600 So.2d 1233, 1234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Fredericks v. Florida Dept. of Commerce, 323 So.2d 286, 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission’s order denying appellant unemployment benefits. We hold that the record does not support a finding of theft by appellant. The evidence demonstrates that appellant’s conduct did not rise to the level of “wilful or wanton disregard of an employer’s interests_” § 443.036(26)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); Adams v. Burdines, Inc., 600 So.2d 1233, 1234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Fredericks v. Florida Dept. of Commerce, 323 So.2d 286, 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Reversed and remanded.

Bobo v. Caterair International Corp., 657 So. 2d 4, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3475, 1995 WL 144265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

657 So. 2d 4 (Bobo v. Caterair International Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related