Bobick v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority

648 So. 2d 1263, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 601, 1995 WL 36158
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1995·No. No. 94-1719·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Judy Bobiek appeals an order of the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority which rejected her protest of the disqualification of her bid for the Authority’s cleaning contract and the award of the contract to another bidder. We find no error in the Authority’s conclusion that the requirement for “references from (3) three vendors” meant that the bidder must include three letters of reference, rather than a list of references. Although the Authority had the power to waive the irregularity, it was not obliged to do so. See generally Liberty County v. Baxter’s Asphalt & Concrete, Inc., 421 So.2d 505, 507 (Fla.1982). As to the second point on appeal, the record does not, in our view, show any impropriety in the handling of the bids. The order under review is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bobick v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, 648 So. 2d 1263, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 601, 1995 WL 36158 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

648 So. 2d 1263 (Bobick v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LIBERTY CTY. v. Baxter's Asphalt & Concrete, Inc.
421 So. 2d 505 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)