Bobby Schroeder, III v. Dekalb County, Georgia
This text of Bobby Schroeder, III v. Dekalb County, Georgia (Bobby Schroeder, III v. Dekalb County, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., GOBEIL and COOMER, JJ.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules
May 8, 2019
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A17A0551. SCHROEDER v. DEKALB COUNTY et al.
MCFADDEN, Presiding Judge.
In Withers v. Schroeder, 304 Ga. 394 (819 SE2d 49) (2018), the Supreme Court
of Georgia reversed in part our previous decision in Schroeder v. DeKalb County, 341
Ga. App. 748 (802 SE2d 277) (2017). The Court ruled that defendants Chief Judge
Nelly Withers of the former DeKalb County Recorder’s Court and Troy Thompson,
who was the court administrator of that court, were entitled to judicial immunity and
quasi-judicial immunity in Bobby Schroeder’s lawsuit against them and others, and
that the lawsuit could not move forward against Withers and Thompson in their
individual capacities. Withers, 304 Ga. at 394.
The Supreme Court did not address our holdings that the trial court properly
dismissed Schroeder’s state law claims against the county and the defendants in their official capacities because his ante litem notice was untimely, 341 Ga. app. at 750-
751 (2); that the trial court erred by dismissing his state law claims against the John
Doe defendants in their individual capacities, 341 Ga. App. at 751-752 (3); see also
Withers, 304 Ga. at 400 n. 9; that Schroeder abandoned any claim of error pertaining
to the trial court’s dismissal of any 42 USC § 1983 claims against the John Doe
defendants, 341 Ga. App. at 754 (5) (a); and that the trial court erred by dismissing
his 42 USC § 1983 claim against the county. 341 Ga. App. at 754-755 (4) (b).
Because those holdings are consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion, they
become binding upon the return of the remittitur. Shadix v. Carroll County, 274 Ga.
560, 563 (1) (554 SE2d 465) (2001).
Accordingly, we adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia as our
own, affirm the trial court’s grant of the motion for judgment on the pleadings to
Withers and Thompson in their individual capacities, and remand the case for further
proceedings consistent with the opinion of our Supreme Court.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Gobeil and Coomer, JJ.,
concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bobby Schroeder, III v. Dekalb County, Georgia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-schroeder-iii-v-dekalb-county-georgia-gactapp-2019.