Bobby Ray Gill v. United States

330 F.2d 241, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5912
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 30, 1964·No. 20773·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The Court permits a delayed filing of a petition for rehearing.

The opinion and judgment of this Court rendered on January 2, 1964 appears to be in conflict with opinions in No. 20,487, Pike v. United States, 330 F.2d 53, and No. 20,698, Romero v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 327 F.2d 711. Upon further consideration, we think that the two later opinions more closely accord with the view of the Supreme Court in Bishop v. United States, 1956, 350 U.S. 961, 76 S.Ct. 440, 100 L.Ed. 835, and that a different result is not permitted by Machibroda v. United States, 1962, 368 U.S. 487, 495, 496, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473.

The petition for rehearing is therefore granted and the judgment of the district court is reversed for further proceedings in accordance with the opinions in Pike and Romero, supra.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bobby Ray Gill v. United States, 330 F.2d 241, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5912 (5th Cir. 1964).

330 F.2d 241 (Bobby Ray Gill v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bobby Ray Gill v. United States
421 F.2d 1353 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
State v. Robbins
427 P.2d 10 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1967)