Bobby Perry v. Juanita H. Baker Elbert T. Buck, Jr. William A. Lowry Charles L. Mann Peggy Stamey

52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17550, 1995 WL 227316
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 18, 1995
Docket95-6205
StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 321 (Bobby Perry v. Juanita H. Baker Elbert T. Buck, Jr. William A. Lowry Charles L. Mann Peggy Stamey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bobby Perry v. Juanita H. Baker Elbert T. Buck, Jr. William A. Lowry Charles L. Mann Peggy Stamey, 52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17550, 1995 WL 227316 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bobby PERRY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Juanita H. BAKER; Elbert T. Buck, Jr.; William A. Lowry;
Charles L. Mann; Peggy Stamey, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6205.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995
Decided: April 18, 1995

Bobby Perry, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perry v. Baker, No. CA-94-321 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 F.3d 321, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17550, 1995 WL 227316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-perry-v-juanita-h-baker-elbert-t-buck-jr-wil-ca4-1995.