Bobby L. Jackson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 18, 2003
Docket06-03-00016-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Bobby L. Jackson v. State (Bobby L. Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bobby L. Jackson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________



No. 06-03-00016-CR



BOBBY LYNN JACKSON, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16601





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Bobby Lynn Jackson pled guilty to felony driving while intoxicated, with one prior felony conviction. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, the trial court sentenced him to fifteen years' imprisonment. Jackson filed a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc in December 2002 contending he had not received proper credit for the jail time served before his conviction. The trial court denied this motion, and Jackson appeals.

Article V, Section 6 of the Texas Constitution invests this Court with jurisdiction over "all cases of which the District Courts or County Courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law." Tex. Const. art. V, § 6. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02 (Vernon 1979) provides in pertinent part, "A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal . . . ." Texas courts have consistently construed Article 44.02 to allow an appeal only "from a 'final judgment [or conviction],' though the statute does not contain this limitation on its face." Benford v. State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 408-09 (Tex. App.-Waco 1999, no pet.) (quoting State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)).

We have jurisdiction over other types of criminal appeals only when "expressly granted by law." Benford, 994 S.W.2d at 409 (quoting Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)). No statute vests this Court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc. See State v. Ross, 953 S.W.2d 748, 751-52 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.



Jack Carter

Justice



Date Submitted: March 17, 2003

Date Decided: March 18, 2003



Do Not Publish

"font-family: Times New Roman">Date Submitted: August 26, 2003

Date Decided: August 27, 2003



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ross
953 S.W.2d 748 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Apolinar v. State
820 S.W.2d 792 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
State v. Sellers
790 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Benford v. State
994 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bobby L. Jackson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-l-jackson-v-state-texapp-2003.