Bobby Knox v. Arthur Davis
This text of Bobby Knox v. Arthur Davis (Bobby Knox v. Arthur Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-8149
BOBBY R. KNOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARTHUR DAVIS, Doctor; MS. COLDSMITH, Supervisor of Nurses; MS. SIMMONS, Head Nurse; SUSAN COLLIER, Administrative Programs; KEITH A. KUHNE, Doctor; MS. L. GALLAWAY, Nurse
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:11-ct-03266-F)
Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby R. Knox, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Bobby R. Knox appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Knox v. Davis, No. 5:11-ct-03266-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 13,
2012). We deny Knox’s motions for a protective order/injunctive
relief and his motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bobby Knox v. Arthur Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-knox-v-arthur-davis-ca4-2013.