BOBBY J. NAPIER v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
This text of BOBBY J. NAPIER v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (BOBBY J. NAPIER v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
BOBBY J. NAPIER, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellees.
No. 4D20-65
[April 1, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CA- 010964-XXXX-MB.
Bobby J. Napier, Pahokee, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Duncan v. Moore, 754 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2000) (recognizing that the conditional release statute does not violate the double jeopardy, due process, or ex post facto clauses); Fleming v. State, 697 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (acknowledging that there is no entitlement to credit for time spent on conditional release).
LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BOBBY J. NAPIER v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-j-napier-v-florida-parole-commission-and-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2020.