Bobby Glen Crocker v. State of Tennessee - Concurring
This text of Bobby Glen Crocker v. State of Tennessee - Concurring (Bobby Glen Crocker v. State of Tennessee - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 1, 2012 Session
BOBBY GLEN CROCKER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County No. 05CR98PC Donald E. Parish, Judge
No. W2012-00960-CCA-R3-PC - Filed May 28, 2013
J OSEPH M. T IPTON, P.J., concurring.
I concur with the majority opinion save one point. My colleagues infer that the post- conviction court discredited the Petitioner’s testimony, although the court made no such finding. I believe the record reflects that the court’s findings accepted all the testimony as true but that the court concluded the Petitioner did not provide clear and convincing evidence of his claim. The record supports such a conclusion.
____________________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPTON, PRESIDING JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bobby Glen Crocker v. State of Tennessee - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-glen-crocker-v-state-of-tennessee-concurring-tenncrimapp-2013.