Bobby Frank Cannon v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Bobby Frank Cannon v. United States

420 F.2d 1382

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 17, 1970·No. 24887·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Herein on appeal, inter alia, it is contended in this bank robbery case tried without a jury that there was an issue of insanity below (and the government failed to sustain its burden of proof), that there was a lineup violating United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed. 1149, and that there was ineffective assistance of counsel.

After examination of the record, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. And, it is so ordered. Here, appointed counsel has made an unusually competent presentation of the points he had available.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Herein on appeal, inter alia, it is contended in this bank robbery case tried without a jury that there was an issue of insanity below (and the government failed to sustain its burden of proof), that there was a lineup violating United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed. 1149, and that there was ineffective assistance of counsel.

After examination of the record, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. And, it is so ordered. Here, appointed counsel has made an unusually competent presentation of the points he had available.

Bobby Frank Cannon v. United States, 420 F.2d 1382 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

420 F.2d 1382 (Bobby Frank Cannon v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related