Bobby Frank Cannon v. United States
This text of 420 F.2d 1382 (Bobby Frank Cannon v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Herein on appeal, inter alia, it is contended in this bank robbery case tried without a jury that there was an issue of insanity below (and the government failed to sustain its burden of proof), that there was a lineup violating United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed. 1149, and that there was ineffective assistance of counsel.
After examination of the record, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. And, it is so ordered. Here, appointed counsel has made an unusually competent presentation of the points he had available.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F.2d 1382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-frank-cannon-v-united-states-ca9-1970.