Bobby Davis v. Cheyenne Ind.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 28, 1997·No. 97-1792·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 97-1792 ___________

Bobby Davis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Cheyenne Industries, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: November 20, 1997

Filed: November 28, 1997 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Davis brought this Title VII action, alleging that his former employer, Cheyenne Industries, Inc., discharged him because of his race, African-American. Following a bench trial, the district court1 found that Davis had failed to demonstrate that Cheyenne&s proffered reason for terminating him was pretextual or that his discharge was racially motivated. Davis appeals.

1 The Honorable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. As Davis has failed to provide a transcript or to request one at government expense, we cannot review the district court&s factual findings. See Van Treese v. Blome, 7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). We conclude that based on its factual findings, the district court correctly entered judgment in favor of Cheyenne. See St. Mary&s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 507-08 (1993); Harvey v. Anheuser- Busch, Inc., 38 F.3d 968, 973 (8th Cir. 1994).

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bobby Davis v. Cheyenne Ind., (8th Cir. 1997).

Bobby Davis v. Cheyenne Ind. (Bobby Davis v. Cheyenne Ind.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
509 U.S. 502 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Van Treese v. Blome
7 F.3d 729 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)