Bobby Collier v. Progress Residential Borrower 10 LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 2, 2022
DocketA22D0250
StatusPublished

This text of Bobby Collier v. Progress Residential Borrower 10 LLC (Bobby Collier v. Progress Residential Borrower 10 LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bobby Collier v. Progress Residential Borrower 10 LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 02, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0250. BOBBY COLLIER v. PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 10 LLC.

Progress Residential Borrower 10 LLC filed this dispossessory action in Cobb County Magistrate Court naming as defendants either Cornelius Roberts or “Cornelius Roberts and all others.”1 The defendant(s) defaulted and the trial court issued the writ of possession. One or more of the defendants, including Bobby Collier, moved to open the default and set aside the writ of possession. Following a hearing, the trial court entered an order on January 21, 2022, denying that motion. The order noted that Collier had appeared at the hearing pro se, but that Collier was not a party to the lease in question. Collier has now filed this pro se application seeking discretionary review of the trial court’s order. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “The only avenue of direct appeal available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751, 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). This Court thus may address magistrate court matters only if they already have been reviewed by the state or superior court. See Westwind Corp. v. Washington Fed. S & L Assn., 195 Ga. App. 411, 411 (1) (393 SE2d 479) (1990). Absent an appealable state or superior court order, we are unable to entertain jurisdiction over this case.

1 According to the application at issue, the action was filed only against Roberts. The order sought to be appealed, however, lists the defendants as “Cornelius Roberts and all others.” Accordingly, Collier’s application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/02/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westwind Corporation v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association
393 S.E.2d 479 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Handler v. Hulsey
406 S.E.2d 225 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bobby Collier v. Progress Residential Borrower 10 LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-collier-v-progress-residential-borrower-10-llc-gactapp-2022.