Bobby Bruner v. State
This text of Bobby Bruner v. State (Bobby Bruner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered July 5, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00356-CR
BOBBY BRUNER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB16-31477-C
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s July 1, 2019 motion to abate the appeal pending a
determination of indigency. In the motion, appellate counsel reports that he agreed to represent
appellant on a pro bono basis provided appellant paid the costs for filing the record. Appellant
has not provided funds for the record, and counsel has been unable to communicate with
appellant since April 16, 2019. Counsel relates that appellant’s telephone and emergency contact
telephone numbers have been disconnected. Counsel requests the Court abate this appeal to
allow the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine if appellant is indigent and whether
counsel’s representation should continue.
We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant’s
whereabouts are known and, if not, whether counsel has made a reasonable effort to locate
appellant. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations
and determine, to the extent possible, whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal or has
abandoned the appeal; appellant’s current address, if determinable; and if appellant’s address is
unknown, what actions counsel has taken to attempt to locate appellant.
We further ORDER the trial court to determine whether appellant is indigent and, if so,
whether he desires appointed appellate counsel. The trial court is directed to conduct such
inquiries and to enter such orders as are necessary to address the matters of appellant’s indigence
and right to representation. If the trial court determines appellant has not abandoned the appeal,
he is indigent, and he desires appellate counsel, the trial court shall appoint him counsel. The
trial court shall make appropriate findings of fact and recommendations regarding the matter of
appellant’s indigence and representation.
The trial court is ORDERED to file a clerk’s record within THIRTY DAYS of the date
of this order containing (1) its findings on the matters of appellant’s abandonment or intent to
prosecute the appeal; (2) appellant’s current address if determinable; (3) if appellant’s current
address is unknown, the actions counsel has taken to locate appellant; (4) appellant’s indigence
and whether appellant is entitled to appellate counsel; and (5) the name and address of any
counsel the trial court appoints to represent appellant.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated when the findings are received or at such other time as the Court deems
appropriate.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bobby Bruner v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-bruner-v-state-texapp-2019.