Bobby Brown v. Velocity Investments, LLC, Assignee of Upstart Network, Inc.
This text of Bobby Brown v. Velocity Investments, LLC, Assignee of Upstart Network, Inc. (Bobby Brown v. Velocity Investments, LLC, Assignee of Upstart Network, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ June 08, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A2080. BOBBY BROWN v. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ASSIGNEE OF UPSTART NETWORK, INC.
Velocity Investments, LLC, as assignee of Upstart Network, Inc., (“Velocity”) filed suit against Bobby Brown to recover on a loan agreement. On January 20, 2026, the trial court granted Velocity’s motion for summary judgment, awarding $1,450.96 in principal, $190.61 in interest and fees, and $268.00 in court costs. On April 20, 2026, Brown filed a document titled “Notice to Appeal,” and this case was transmitted from the trial court.1 To the extent Brown seeks to appeal the trial court’s summary judgment ruling — the only order included in the record — we lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, Brown’s appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38(a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon this Court. Yanes v. Escobar, 362 Ga. App. 896, 898 (870 SE2d 506) (2022). Here, however, Brown did not file his notice of appeal until 90 days after entry of the trial court’s order. Second, under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. See Anderson v. Laureano, 342 Ga. App. 888, 888 (805 SE2d
1 Although the trial court treated the filing as a notice of appeal, the document did not satisfy the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-37, because it failed to include the title of the case or the order sought to be appealed. 636) (2017). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Here, the trial court’s judgment does not meet the damages threshold. Brown was thus required to comply with the discretionary appeal procedures. For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/08/2026 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bobby Brown v. Velocity Investments, LLC, Assignee of Upstart Network, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobby-brown-v-velocity-investments-llc-assignee-of-upstart-network-inc-gactapp-2026.