Bobbitt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bobbitt v. State

466 S.W.3d 570, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 2015 WL 1548865

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 2015·No. No. ED 101516·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Richard L. Bobbitt appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Richard L. Bobbitt appeals the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bobbitt v. State, 466 S.W.3d 570, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 2015 WL 1548865 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

466 S.W.3d 570 (Bobbitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.