Bobbitt v. Blakemore

154 S.W. 941, 153 Ky. 170, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 797
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided March 28, 1913·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Turner

Affirming.

This is an action in ejectment instituted by appellees against appellant wherein they recovered from him a small tract of about 3% acres in Lincoln County.

This court, upon motion of appellees, has heretofore stricken out the bill of exceptions appearing in the record, and under the well known rule of practice it leaves nothing for determination except whether the judgment is supported by the pleadings.

It is simply an action in ejectment, and the pleadings clearly and explicitly set forth the plaintiff’s right of recovery, and are amply sufficient to sustain the judgment of the circuit court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bobbitt v. Blakemore, 154 S.W. 941, 153 Ky. 170, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 797 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913).

154 S.W. 941 (Bobbitt v. Blakemore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Bellevue v. Hall
174 S.W.2d 24 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1943)
Easley & Siegleman v. Kramer
94 S.W.2d 1030 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1936)
Yates v. Stevenson
234 S.W. 747 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1921)
Forgy & Wells v. Rapier Sugar Feed Co.
230 S.W. 534 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1921)
Brewer v. Commonwealth
221 S.W. 224 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1920)
Baker v. Whittaker
215 S.W. 178 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1919)
McNeal's Admr. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
214 S.W. 888 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1919)