Bobbitt v. Albright

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bobbitt v. Albright

812 S.W.2d 539, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 185

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 1991·No. Nos. 57802, 57834·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners appeal from the trial court’s order in a discovery of assets action; defendant Earl Ray cross-appeals. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners appeal from the trial court’s order in a discovery of assets action; defendant Earl Ray cross-appeals. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bobbitt v. Albright, 812 S.W.2d 539, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 185 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

812 S.W.2d 539 (Bobbitt v. Albright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.