Bobbie Sue Hayes v. David Lee Walters
Opinion
Dismiss and Opinion Filed August 28, 2024
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00805-CV
BOBBIE SUE HAYES, Appellant
V.
DAVID LEE WALTERS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FA-23-0058
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Nowell On July 29, 2024, after receiving a copy of the trial court’s order vacating the
appealed order on motion for appointment of receiver, we informed the parties that
it appeared the appeal had become moot and was subject to dismissal for want of
jurisdiction unless, within ten days, appellant showed cause as to why the appeal
should not be dismissed. See City of Dallas v. Woodfield, 305 S.W.3d 412, 416
(Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.). To date, appellant has not responded. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Woodfield, 305
S.W.3d at 416.
/Erin A. Nowell// 240805f.p05 ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
BOBBIE SUE HAYES, Appellant On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, No. 05-24-00805-CV V. Texas Trial Court Cause No. FA-23-0058. DAVID LEE WALTERS, Appellee Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell, Justices Molberg and Kennedy participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee David Lee Walters recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Bobbie Sue Hayes.
Judgment entered this 28th day of August, 2024.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bobbie Sue Hayes v. David Lee Walters (Bobbie Sue Hayes v. David Lee Walters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.