Bobbie Eugene Glenn v. United States

367 F.2d 582
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 1966
Docket10619
StatusPublished

This text of 367 F.2d 582 (Bobbie Eugene Glenn v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bobbie Eugene Glenn v. United States, 367 F.2d 582 (4th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Glenn was convicted by a jury upon an indictment charging him with the theft of merchandise from an interstate shipment in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. Having carefully considered the record, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel we find no error in the trial.

As one of his assignments of error on appeal Glenn seeks to attack the court's instructions to the jury as erroneous and incomplete. No objection to the instructions was offered below as required by Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This court could, under Rule 52(b), notice plain error affecting substantial rights even in the absence of objection in the District Court but we find no such error here. The judgment below will be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 F.2d 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobbie-eugene-glenn-v-united-states-ca4-1966.