Bobbi Jo Fisher v. Tennessee Insurance Company - Concurring
This text of Bobbi Jo Fisher v. Tennessee Insurance Company - Concurring (Bobbi Jo Fisher v. Tennessee Insurance Company - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 13, 2004 Session
BOBBI JO FISHER v. TENNESSEE INSURANCE COMPANY
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 2-613-02 Harold Wimberly, Judge
No. E2004-00189-COA-R3-CV Filed August 24, 2004
D. Michael Swiney, J., concurring.
While I concur in the majority’s decision to reverse and dismiss this case, I feel it necessary to concur separately to state my understanding that our holding in this case is limited to an insured’s claim for collision damage coverage only. I believe there may be public policy considerations that would need to be considered in a case involving liability, as opposed to collision, coverage. That question is not now before us, and I do not believe those public policy considerations are applicable in a case such as the one now before us involving an insurance claim solely for collision damage coverage. I, therefore, concur in the majority’s decision to reverse and dismiss.
______________________________ D. MICHAEL SWINEY, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bobbi Jo Fisher v. Tennessee Insurance Company - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bobbi-jo-fisher-v-tennessee-insurance-company-conc-tennctapp-2004.