Bob v. Hecksher

235 A.D. 601, 254 N.Y.S. 696

This text of 235 A.D. 601 (Bob v. Hecksher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bob v. Hecksher, 235 A.D. 601, 254 N.Y.S. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complaint sets forth one cause of action. It alleges a number of acts on the part of the defendants each of which is said to have been the result of a concerted attempt on the part of the defendants to defraud the plaintiff. The cause of action set forth in the complaint has been properly pleaded. (See Green v. Davies, 83 App. Div. 216.) The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Pinch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Davies
83 A.D. 216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 601, 254 N.Y.S. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bob-v-hecksher-nyappdiv-1932.