Bob Maxcey, M.D. and Michael G. Neret, M.D. v. Doris McGee

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bob Maxcey, M.D. and Michael G. Neret, M.D. v. Doris McGee

DecidedOctober 9, 2008

Docket13-08-00377-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Bob Maxcey, M.D. and Michael G. Neret, M.D. v. Doris McGee (Bob Maxcey, M.D. and Michael G. Neret, M.D. v. Doris McGee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bob Maxcey, M.D. and Michael G. Neret, M.D. v. Doris McGee, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00377-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

BOB MAXCEY, M.D. AND

MICHAEL G. NERET, M.D., Appellants,

v.

DORIS MCGEE, Appellee.

On appeal from the 23rd District Court of Matagorda County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Yañez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Bob Maxcey, M.D. and Michael G. Neret, M.D., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 23th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas, in cause number 07-H-0475-C. Appellant, Bob Maxcey, M.D., has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellant, Michael G. Neret, M.D., has also filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motions to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motions should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Both appellants' motions to dismiss are granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 9th day of October, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-08-00377-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

BOB MAXCEY, M.D. AND

MICHAEL G. NERET, M.D., Appellants,

v.

DORIS MCGEE, Appellee.

On appeal from the 23rd District Court of Matagorda County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Yañez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Bob Maxcey, M.D. and Michael G. Neret, M.D., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 23th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas, in cause number 07-H-0475-C. Appellant, Bob Maxcey, M.D., has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellant, Michael G. Neret, M.D., has also filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motions to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motions should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Both appellants' motions to dismiss are granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 9th day of October, 2008.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bob Maxcey, M.D. and Michael G. Neret, M.D. v. Doris McGee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bob-maxcey-md-and-michael-g-neret-md-v-doris-mcgee-texapp-2008.