Boaz v. Graham
1 White & W. 63
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 19, 1881
DocketNo. 1154, Op. Book No. 3, p. 511
StatusPublished
This text of 1 White & W. 63 (Boaz v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boaz v. Graham, 1 White & W. 63 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 159. Jurisdiction; forcible entry and detainer. In a suit of forcible entry and detainer, where the justice rendered judgment for more than $200 damages, his judgment was void for the excess over that sum, and that sum having been paid by the defendant, an execution for the excess of the iudgment was perpetually enjoined.
Eeverséd and rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boaz-v-graham-texapp-1881.