BOAZ LEVY v. SHOSANIT LEVY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 23, 2021
Docket21-0481
StatusPublished

This text of BOAZ LEVY v. SHOSANIT LEVY (BOAZ LEVY v. SHOSANIT LEVY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BOAZ LEVY v. SHOSANIT LEVY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 23, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-481 Lower Tribunal No. 20-11953 FC ________________

Boaz Levy, Appellant,

vs.

Shosanit Levy, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria Elena Verde, Judge.

Lorenzen Law, P.A., and Dirk Lorenzen, for appellant.

Law Office of Debra Kay Cohen, and Debra Kay Cohen, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Obregon v. Rosana Corp., 232 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. 3d

DCA 2017) (holding appellant waived claim that trial court erred in failing to

conduct an evidentiary hearing, where appellant attended hearing, had an

opportunity to be heard, and failed to object to the non-evidentiary nature of

the hearing); In re F.J.G.M., 196 So. 3d 534 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (observing

that because appellant did not object to the trial court’s failure to conduct an

evidentiary hearing, the issue was not preserved for appellate review); NRD

Invs., Inc. v. Velazquez, 976 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (affirming trial

court’s entry of temporary injunction and holding that, because appellant

never objected to the non-evidentiary nature of the hearings held in the trial

court, appellant waived the issue for appeal); Piloto v. Lauria, 45 So. 3d 565

(Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in not

conducting an evidentiary hearing before ruling on issue was not preserved

for review, where appellant failed to request the trial court hold an evidentiary

hearing); Dismas Charities, Inc. v. Dabbs, 795 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA

2001) (same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NRD Investments, Inc. v. Velazquez
976 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
In the Interest Of: F.J.G.M.
196 So. 3d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Piloto v. Lauria
45 So. 3d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Dismas Charities, Inc. v. Dabbs
795 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BOAZ LEVY v. SHOSANIT LEVY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boaz-levy-v-shosanit-levy-fladistctapp-2021.