Boatwright v. State

847 So. 2d 1141, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9389, 2003 WL 21459613
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 2003
DocketNo. 3D03-471
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 847 So. 2d 1141 (Boatwright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boatwright v. State, 847 So. 2d 1141, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9389, 2003 WL 21459613 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Boatwright was on community control when he asked for and received permission to attend church services on a Sunday between 8:00 a.m and 12:00 p.m. Instead of returning at that time, however, he was caught up in the religiosity of the church services and went from there to the bishop’s home for group counseling until 5:30 p.m. when he was returned to his home by the same church bus which had picked him up in the morning. This appeal is from an order violating his community control and imposing a 15 year sentence on the underlying charges on the ground that, during the period between 12:00 p.m. and 5:30 p.m., he was unauthorizedly absent from his residence. We cannot approve such a decision, worthy as it is of Draco himself.

It is self-evident that Boatwright’s conduct did not, as required, constitute a “willful and substantial” violation of his community control. See VanWagner v. State, 677 So.2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Johnson v. State, 668 So.2d 240 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Tobias v. State, 641 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Shaw v. State, 391 So.2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); see also Navedo v. State, 847 So.2d 585(Fla. 3d DCA 2003)(voluntary surrender at 2:50 p.m. rather than 9:00 a.m. as agreed, de minimis deviation which did not vitiate agreement to mitigate sentence); Amaya v. State, 653 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(same; surrender at 3:30 p.m. rather than 9:00 a.m. as provided by plea bargain). Accordingly, we reverse the order and sentence under review and require that the defendant be restored to community control forthwith.

Reversed.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rousey v. State
226 So. 3d 1015 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Kevin Jones v. State
149 So. 3d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Cherry v. State
855 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 So. 2d 1141, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9389, 2003 WL 21459613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatwright-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.