Boatwright v. Brannan
192 So. 3d 1288, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9904, 2016 WL 3512290
This text of 192 So. 3d 1288 (Boatwright v. Brannan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boatwright v. Brannan, 192 So. 3d 1288, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9904, 2016 WL 3512290 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Aills v. Boemi, 29 So.3d 1105, 1109 (Fla.2010) (“Appellate review is ... limited to the specific grounds for objection raised at trial.”); Yau v. IWDWarriors, Corp., 144 So.3d 557, 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (holding that an appellate court cannot reverse an “unpre-[1289]*1289served claim of error absent fundamental error”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aills v. Boemi
29 So. 3d 1105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Yau v. IWDWarriors, Corp.
144 So. 3d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
192 So. 3d 1288, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9904, 2016 WL 3512290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatwright-v-brannan-fladistctapp-2016.