Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Boatwright v. Brannan

Boatwright v. Brannan

192 So. 3d 1288, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9904, 2016 WL 3512290
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2016·No. No. 1D14-5905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Aills v. Boemi, 29 So.3d 1105, 1109 (Fla.2010) (“Appellate review is ... limited to the specific grounds for objection raised at trial.”); Yau v. IWDWarriors, Corp., 144 So.3d 557, 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (holding that an appellate court cannot reverse an “unpre-[1289]*1289served claim of error absent fundamental error”).

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS and MAKAR, JJ., concur,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boatwright v. Brannan, 192 So. 3d 1288, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9904, 2016 WL 3512290 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

192 So. 3d 1288 (Boatwright v. Brannan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aills v. Boemi
29 So. 3d 1105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Yau v. IWDWarriors, Corp.
144 So. 3d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)