Boatright v. State
This text of 549 So. 2d 1173 (Boatright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine, conspiracy to traffic in cannabis, attempted trafficking in cocaine, and attempted trafficking in cannabis. We affirm the appellant’s convictions but reverse his sentences and remand for resentencing. With respect to each conviction, the appellant was sentenced to a period of probation following a period of incarceration. Various conditions of probation were imposed by the trial judge subsequent to the sentencing hearing. The conditions were not discussed at the sentencing hearing and, therefore, the appellant had no opportunity to object to any of them. As a consequence, our review is hampered by the absence of any ruling by the trial judge on the appellant’s objections.
Accordingly, we reverse the sentences and remand for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 So. 2d 1173, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2435, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5704, 1989 WL 119555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boatright-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.